SAN FRANCISCO (AP) – Jurors have ended their 5th day of deliberations without attaining a verdict within the homicide trial that sparked a countrywide debate over immigration coverage.
Legal mavens stated Wednesday that deliberations are taking longer than same old for a regular homicide trial. They observe that the case is difficult via the defendant’s declare that the gun that killed Kate Steinle fired unintentionally.
Jurors are deciding whether or not Jose Ines Garcia Zarate supposed to shoot Steinle in 2015 or in the event that they imagine his declare that the the shooting was once unintended.
Longtime San Francisco Bay Area protection lawyer Dan Horowitz says jurors is also suffering to discover a compromise verdict wanting homicide.
University of California, Berkeley regulation professor Andrea Roth says the long deliberations would possibly imply the jurors are divided.
Jurors resume deliberating Thursday.